Long live advertising.

I couldn't sign off without a little nod to my good pals Mike & Phil (or Phil & Mike in this pic), an up and coming team who are proving they have what it takes to make it in this industry. 

This week they were successful at the Chip Shop Awards, winning a much coveted Chip, whilst up against established creatives from the UK and beyond. They celebrated in style at Fabric, before moving on to a more refined location for a relaxing brandy and cuban. 

A fine night was had by all, and the irony of these lads picking up their first adult award (student ones don't count apparently), on the same day that I packed away my pens and pad for the last time was not lost on me. Most definitely a case of out with the old-skool, in with the new.

Good luck chaps.

That really is it.

Advertising is dead.

What a week in advertising.

First, Portfolio night 7 is cancelled in London cos none of the agencies can be arsed to host it.

Then Jai & Wal split up, with Wal hinting that he may be leaving London.

Now Scamp decides he cant be bothered to blog anymore either.

Next thing you know Dave Trott will turn up on Britain's got talent, Morris dancing to dub-step in an attempt to launch a new career out of the ad game.

London, hub of the ad world (outside the US i guess), seems to be on its knees at the moment.

More than ever.

So it is with regret, but less regret than i ever imagined, that i am pulling out of the race.

I salute those who keep at it. God speed you brave warriors.

Fin.

You say Tulips i say Two Lips.

There's not many ads that leave me speechless but JWT New York's latest work for Wilkinson Sword www.mowthelawn.co.uk have managed it with this line:

"Whenever I see a weed, I mow that rascal down, so all that's left for me to see is tulips on the mound."

Oof!

Blogger Big Up

Just a quick post to big up friends of the Blog, Mike and Phil. They live at www.mikeandphil.blogspot.com , post a rather good account of their adventures in adland, and are also pretty good at match-making.

Cheers dudes.

Portfolio Night 7. To be or not to be?

Anyone who's anyone on the junior circuit will be well aware of the forth coming Portfolio night 7 - scheduled for June 11th this year. 

In 2008 JWT hosted the London leg , and it was a real success. Everyone got placements, as well as a free mug and T-shirt*, and all was right with the World.

So this year i've been keeping an eye on their website, www.portfolionight.com,  to find out when the tickets will be available, only to find out that London (as well as many other cities around the World) has yet to find a host for the event.

Which seems strange. The teams that turn out are usually pretty clued up, the CDs** that give the crits usually find some potentially good new blood, and it's another night for everyone involved to get nicely sauced.

If nobody steps forward soon, PN7 ain't gonna happen in London - which will be a real shame. And another kick in the goolies for the juniors out there...

 

*Not strictly true, the tickets were £15 or something.

** Except Mr Fink, who i saw make someone cry last year. Oh snap.

How refreshing.

This is bloody genius. 

http://www.brandrepublic.com/Campaign/News/880522/Men-dressed-Tic-Tacs-re-enact-missed-Everton-goal/

Shame it's only a viral, it pisses all over their TV stuff. Love it. 

How does shit like this get made?

I don't care if this improves sales, and you might even laugh at it in a moment of childlike idiocy, but it makes me want to sit in a dark corner and really think about my choices in life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx-bChDLJpE

I'm not sure what depresses me the most; the 'creative' that thought up this drivel and deemed it worthy of showing to the CD, the CD that read the script and thought, 'hmmm they've really cracked it here', or the client who considered this piece of toss a worthy ambassador for their product, brand, and name, or the fact that i'm not hired. Sour grapes? Too fucking right!

Top marks for consistency though. As truly appalling as the last one.

Happy new year?

Back from hibernation i've noticed a shift in the land of tv ads in the early weeks of 2009. In the midst of the credit wank crunch we're suddenly comparing the meerkats with Al, getting our groove on with More Than, exploring clubland with Pablo, and getting Swift Covered with Iggy.

So is all this 'fun' advertising in these dark days all a big coincidence? Apparently not. I caught BBH's Ben Fennell on the Beeb breakfast news on 'Blue Monday', officially the most depressing day of the year, briefly explaining the role of advertising in lifting the spirits of the nation.

It turns out that far from being a force of evil, ads can play their part in filling us with hope when the news fills us with despair. Which we all know is bollocks. The reality is, clients want uplifting ads to make consumers feel an affinity towards their brands and ultimately to consume their products. So all of a sudden creatives are being given new levels of freedom and the results are speaking for themselves.

Which leaves me pondering why this isn't always the way it's done. All the most successful ads are also the most creative, entertaining, and fun ads, no? Many theorists and ad legends agree that the most effective way to reach the consumer is through their heart not their head. Well maybe clients don't see things this way, and will continue to reserve desperate measures for desperate times. In which case creatives should relish this recession and make the most of the year ahead.

And judging by the first batch of new ads 2009 is set to be a very good year for creativity, the award shows are going to rock, ailing agencies are going to pick up, we're all going to get hired, and advertising will save the world.

Happy New Year.

Brilliant spec work.

I'm not sure what to make of companies with 'in-house' creative departments, seems a bit anti-ad agency to me, and if every client followed suit we'd all be in the shit.

Can't fault this little viral from Spec-Savers though...

http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1600158118/bctid2225054001

Good send up guys.

RKCR/Y&R+M&SXMAS=A+++

When i read today's news that the new M&S Christmas ad featuring Take That, Twiggy, Erin O'Connor, Lily Cole, Myleene Klass and Noémie Lenoir was about to be released i'm not afraid to admit i shuddered in horror (except for Ms Lenior of course).

But having watched the ad, i'm happy to say i was shocked for all the wrong reasons. Or is that right reasons? Because i bloody liked it. Really liked it. It's genius. Have a look here:

http://www.brandrepublic.com/Campaign/News/861754/join-festivities-M-S-Christmas-ad/

And why is it genius? No dialogue.

Nice one Pip and Chris at Y&R.

How Stella got her groove back

Love the new ad for Stella 4% from Mother, they're so hot right now...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2008/nov/04/advertising

Any thoughts?

Hotel, Motel...

Isn't it weird how sometimes an ad campaign can have it's awful executions:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7kQkGDprzw

And it's brilliant ones:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pjbKV8tQLQ

Well done, and not-so-well done Fallon Minneapolis.

WPPeed all over.

Hope none of you are dithering over a job offer from any WPP owned agency:

http://www.brandrepublic.com/Campaign/News/854855/WPP-orders-hiring-freeze-amid-client-spending-cuts/

Wouldn't it be nice if a top agency came out and said "Fuck the credit crunch: we're doing great and we're hiring".

If anyone knows of any behaviour of this kind, please share it. It's good to talk.

Absolute-ly not sure.

When it comes to ads, I'm an opinionated git (although i think that's healthy for someone trying to get into the industry) so there are always ads running on the telly box that i love (Bud Dedication - "Now throw in an Arbitrary Refrain" - genius) and some that i hate (the Trainline.com - don't even get me started).

But every now and then an ad (or campaign) appears that I'm really not sure about- this time it's the Absolute Radio launch campaign:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2008/oct/10/commercialradio-radio

I really wasn't sure whether i thought it as clever usage of actor Jordan Prentice, or whether it's exploitation of a dwarf to represent a crazy security guard.

And then i read this from Absolute Radio brand director, Chris Lawson:

"The idea was to create something that sums up the brand, we are trying for squirm humour like you might see on My Name Is Earl or Curb Your Enthusiasm."

Hmmm, 'squirm humour' it is then. But what exactly are we squirming at? And where is the humour? Are we supposed to laugh at the notion of a dwarf security guard? Or is that the squirm factor?

Like i say, i'm not sure whether i think it's funny and irreverent, or just in poor taste.

I'd love to know what the vast sums of readers of this blog think...

Are you taking the piss, Mr Pringle?

If you read Scamp (and you do) you'll have seen yesterdays post referring (kind of) to an aptitude test that has been designed to identify 'Diagonal Thinkers', which is being run by the IPA. 'Breaking into advertising' was the cover story of the Guardian Work section on Saturday, and if you missed it here's the gist of what a Diagonal Thinker is:

"(Diagonal Thinking) is the ability to switch effortlessly between linear, logical thought processes to lateral creative ones... and it seems to be one of the defining characteristics of people who do well in our industry".

According to the IPA, only 10% of the population can think diagonally. And if you score more than 90% in the test, you can print off an IPA certificate, which, says IPA director general Hamish Pringle, you can then attach to your CV as proof of your talent, which will become your "passport to adland".

So if you really want a job in advertising, chuck out your portfolio, get on www.diagonalthinking.co.uk and show off your shiny certificate around Soho instead.

PS. If you're wondering how i did, my PC crashed half way through the test, and you only get one chance, so i'm buggered.

Are you really hungry for advertising?

If you're one of the many dole-mongers looking to get on the ad-ladder you may or may not be aware of a new scheme known as the LHA. Sound pretty cool? Well it's not...

The LHA is the Local Housing Allowance, a new scheme which is used to determine how much housing benefit you are entitled to whilst looking for one of those cleverly concealed jobs in adland.

And guess what? They've capped it at something like £84 a week, instead of covering your share of the rent like they used to. So let's say your rent is £110 a week - you're now £26 a week poorer. Take that from your job-seekers, and you're left with a princely sum of around £34 a week to live on.

Minus all your other outgoings (utility bills etc, we're not even talking food here) and yep you're left with pretty much... fuck all.

So now, more than ever, it really is down to who is hungriest for a job in advertising.

I'm off to eat some mud.

You're not wrong there, Wal.

Chances are, if you read this blog you read Creative in London. The latest post from Wal caused more than the usual vitriol from the anonymous commentors out there.

I think Wal has a good point though.

I know a team who have been rocking an agency for months now on placement, getting out more work than most of the creative department combined. But the ECD wont hire them because he doesn't think their book is strong enough.

Go figure.

I always thought your book was to get you on placement, then your performance on placement would determine your chances of getting hired.

I hate knowing nothing.

It's not me, it's you...

If anyone noticed, i've not posted recently, and this is because I've recently become a single creative again. And since divorcing my old AD i've found the whole process of finding a suitable replacement quite time consuming, and a real eye opener as to just who is out there on the singles scene.

And it got me thinking about why in London juniors are expected to arrive at agencies in ready-team format. I know there is an arguement that agencies can afford to be picky who they take on and they don't need the hassle of matching ADs to suitable CWs.

But taking on teams with a combined portfolio surely disguises the fact that one member of the team probably carries the other member to some extent, and therefore you are employing less than what you are paying for.

If an agency employs CWs and ADs seperately, as they do in the states, would you not increase the chances of hooking up a brilliant writer with a brilliant artiste, with the combined effect of producing brilliant advertising?

I guess it's left for the team to be brilliant before they arrive together at an agency and can produce work from day one, having presumably already worked together on briefs for some time.

Still, it seems a false economy to me. If creative budgets are so small, and with all this credit crunch bullshit, why don't agencies seek out the best single juniors and try and match them up within the agency, rather than telling them to 'come back when you've got a partner'.

Just a thought.

Getting hired: a marathon or a sprint?

After pounding the streets for two years, a certain someone I know has now reached a fork in the road and doesn't know which direction to head down.

Down one street lurks a little known integrated agency that may be willing to hire after a few weeks of hard graft and cracking briefs.

Down the other street rows of big ass ATL agencies sit side-by-side with offers of placements galore, but with the same sign hung on the front door: WE'RE NOT HIRING.

Now here come the pro's and the con's:

Small agency.
Pro's: Opportunities to be hands on, including travelling to exotic locations (not that that should matter, although with an August like this I'd be tempted), a salary you can actually live on and buy clothes and stuff (like loan cheque day at uni), and pay the rent on time. People know your name.

Con's: The work. You'll never ever produce any work worthy of putting in the book - obscure, safe clients with no desire to push boundaries or do anything remotely interesting. Boss sits about five desks away and meddles in everything you do, buggers up the briefs, directs the creative (although not a creative director).

Big agencies.
Pro's: Working alongside some of the best people in advertising, learning from the best. Opportunities to work on great briefs (you may have to steal them though), with massive clients, and under the guidance of top CD's.

Con's: No one cares who you are, you can produce more work than runs than the entire creative department combined but you still wont get hired. You're poorer than when you're on the dole, and people think you're rude when you decline after work drinks - oblivious to the fact you need that £20 for food for the next two weeks.

So here's the dilemma: Do you take the first job offered, or hold out the the job you've been aiming for for the last two(+) years?

I can't remember who once said it, but they said: In advertising, first get a job; then get the job.

I'm not sure i agree with this. Do teams from tiny little agencies get hired by big bad agencies? If you don't get hired through a placement, can you get hired through a book/reel of spec work? Is taking a job in integrated detrimental to getting that dream ATL job? Should you keep on doing the placement rounds and wait for your lucky break?

Sorry this post raises more questions than answers, but I'd love to know what the few of you that read this blog think about this subject.

Formula One.

Just thought i'd share the process of how i come up with campaigns for the portfolio. I'm not big on formulas (they remind me of those massive marketing textbooks at uni) but this is definitely one i'm glad i came across once upon a time. I don't know where it came from or who devised it, but it's pretty simple and it works for me:

So firstly pick a product (sometimes the hardest part for some reason).

Then write down everything about it, good and bad. Try to avoid obvious selling points, find an insight.

Look for a human benefit that could occur due to one of these insights.

Turn this into your strategy - the sentence that your ideas and executions will adhere to.

From your strategy come up with a strapline.

Turn your strapline into a full-blown integrated campaign.

I know i'm not going into any depth here but i think it's a pretty good basis for idea generation for your book. Who ever said advertising isn't easy?